1. Parcel facts
Land area, frontage, depth and shape from the cadastre, plus easements and title notes. Everything downstream is geometry first — a report that has not read the parcel cannot honestly estimate a yield.
Plenty of documents call themselves development reports. Most restate the title, the land size and a zoning label. A genuine development potential report answers two harder questions: what could be built here, and what do the numbers say about doing it. Here is the full checklist — and how to get one computed for any address in about a minute.
Get a free development readRun the full site reportWhether you are an owner wondering if your block is worth more to a developer than to a home buyer, an agent preparing a listing pitch, or a buyer sizing up a site, the document you want is the same: a report that connects the planning facts to the commercial answer. Use the checklist below to judge any report you are offered — including ours.
Land area, frontage, depth and shape from the cadastre, plus easements and title notes. Everything downstream is geometry first — a report that has not read the parcel cannot honestly estimate a yield.
The zone, and in plain language what it actually permits — single dwellings, dual occupancy, townhouses, apartments, mixed use. A zone code alone is a label, not an answer.
Heritage, character, flood, bushfire, trees, airport or corridor overlays — each can shrink the envelope or add conditions. The honest report lists what applies and what it means.
The site-area-per-dwelling or lot-size minimums that set the theoretical ceiling, shown with the arithmetic — so you can see how the yield number was reached, not just accept it.
The realistic dwelling or lot count once frontage, access, parking, open space and setbacks are respected — usually a range, and honest about which end is comfortable. See how many units can I fit? for the method.
What has recently been approved nearby — land divisions, multi-dwelling projects — because precedent is the strongest tell for how the planning system treats sites like this one.
Comparable sales and market medians for the finished product, from real data — not a hopeful per-unit figure. End values drive everything after them.
Construction, professional fees, contingency, selling and finance at stated, published rates — labelled as defaults to be replaced with quotes, never presented as a QS estimate.
The number that makes the report commercial: working backwards from end values through costs and margin to what a developer could pay for the land. This is the figure owners are almost never shown. Method: how to calculate RLV.
A plain-language list of what could kill the scheme, what evidence is missing, and the sensible next step — survey, planner, agent, or walk away. A report without a “what next” is a brochure.
Both formats have a job. A records-style property report is a fine way to confirm recorded facts. The comparison below is about scope — what each format is built to answer.
| What it covers | Typical PDF property report | Computed development potential report (GoSiteHunt) |
|---|---|---|
| Title, land size, last sale | Yes — recorded facts | Yes — parcel facts from the cadastre |
| Zoning | Usually a zone label on a map | Zone plus what it permits and the density/lot-size arithmetic |
| Estimated value | Automated estimate of the dwelling as it stands | Comparable-evidence end values for the finished scheme, stated as a range |
| Dwelling / lot yield | Not typically covered | Practical yield range from parcel geometry and controls |
| Local approval precedent | Not typically covered | Nearby approvals as a planning-appetite signal |
| Development costs & residual land value | Not typically covered | Indicative costs and the resulting max land price to a developer |
| Risk list & next actions | Reader's job | Explicit, with missing-evidence flags |
| Format | Static snapshot at purchase date | Computed on demand from live data; re-run any time |
The comparison describes report formats, not any particular provider. If a static report covers a row above, good — the checklist is the point.
Find out whether your block reads as a development site and what a developer could pay for the land — before an agent or a door-knocker tells you their version. Start with the free What's My Site Worth screen.
Walk into the listing appointment with the development upside computed: yield, end values, developer land value and the talking points. That is the Agent Hub pre-listing report, and a branded vendor report is $49.
Screen candidates fast and only pay for due diligence on sites that survive the numbers. Run the 60-second Deal Killer Checklist, then the full site report — 1 credit, 50 free to start.
A development potential report answers one address. For the context around it — suburb medians, rents by bedroom, indicative yields and where the numbers line up state-wide — GoSiteHunt Research publishes free, open-data pages: the Adelaide, NSW, Victoria and Queensland opportunity indexes, and a data page for every covered suburb, postcode and LGA. Reading the area first makes the address-level report mean more.
Type an address, get the development read and the developer's-eyes land value free — then decide, on evidence, whether the full report, an agent conversation or a professional feasibility is the right next dollar.
Whatever brought you here, the sound path is the same one developers follow: identify the market, test the planning controls, work out what can actually be built, check real end values, estimate the costs — and only then decide what the land is worth. GoSiteHunt runs that whole sequence from a single address, before you commit due-diligence money.
Run an address through GoSiteHunt or start with the residual land value calculator before you commit due diligence spend.
Before relying on any first-pass development signal, confirm the address against the live planning source, the title and easements, survey dimensions, tree and heritage controls, infrastructure capacity, stormwater, access geometry, parking, open-space requirements and any recent or pending planning amendments. Then test the commercial side: realistic end values, selling time, construction rate, demolition, services, consultant fees, authority contributions, contingency, finance, tax treatment, delivery timeframe, holding costs and the margin required for the risk. The value of GoSiteHunt is that it keeps these checks connected. A page may help a site get onto the shortlist, but the address-level report and a professional review decide whether it deserves an offer.
For search users, this extra context matters because development feasibility is never a single-keyword answer. A useful page should explain the decision path, the assumptions and the next action, not just repeat a suburb, zone or tool name. That is why each GoSiteHunt discovery page links the topic back to a practical screening workflow. The goal is not to pad copy; it is to make the page useful enough that a buyer understands what evidence is missing, what a consultant would still need to confirm, and which next action moves the opportunity closer to or further from a genuine offer. Every page should answer a practical buyer question and point to a measurable address-level check.