1. What can I build?
Zoning, planning controls and the physical constraints of the parcel decide the envelope — townhouses, apartments, a subdivision, mixed-use, retail or something the site simply won’t take.
GoSiteHunt turns any address into zoning, buildable yield, a feasibility summary and the maximum land price you can pay — then screens it GO or NO-GO in seconds, before you waste weeks on the wrong block.
Run a free site checkCalculate max land priceEvery property developer has done the same slow ritual. You find a site, open a spreadsheet, hunt down the zoning, dig up comparable sales, guess a build cost, sketch a yield, and reverse-engineer a land price — and by the time the model says no, you have burned an evening on a block you should have rejected in a minute. Development feasibility software exists to collapse that ritual. It turns the question “is this site worth chasing?” into an answer you get before the site meeting, not after it.
This page explains what development feasibility software actually does, how a developer uses it on a real site, the logic behind a residual land value calculation, and how GoSiteHunt runs that whole chain — find, feasibility, maximum land price, GO/NO-GO — for any address in more than 35 countries, in seconds.
Development feasibility is the discipline of proving, before you buy, that a project stacks up: that the site can legally hold enough dwellings or lots, that the finished product is worth more than it costs to build, and that there is still margin left over to justify the risk. Feasibility software automates the data-gathering and the arithmetic that used to sit in a hand-built spreadsheet.
A good feasibility tool answers four questions in order:
Zoning, planning controls and the physical constraints of the parcel decide the envelope — townhouses, apartments, a subdivision, mixed-use, retail or something the site simply won’t take.
Dwelling or lot yield — the realistic number of sellable units the envelope supports once setbacks, access and site coverage are respected.
Feasibility: expected end value against construction, fees, holding and finance costs, and the profit margin you require to take the risk.
Residual land value — the most you can pay for the dirt and still hit your target return. Pay more and the margin evaporates.
Get those four right early and you filter a long list of addresses down to the handful worth a valuer, a planner and a real offer. That is the entire point: reject fast, so your expensive due diligence only ever lands on live prospects.
The workflow is deliberately blunt. You either start with an address you already have your eye on, or you ask the software to find candidates for you.
If you have an address, you run a single-site report. GoSiteHunt returns the zoning and what you can build on that parcel, an indicative dwelling or lot yield, a feasibility summary, the residual land value, and a GO/NO-GO screen — all from the address alone. If the residual land value sits well below the asking price, you move on without a second thought. Check the zoning lookup and the subdivision potential checker to sanity-check what the parcel will legally carry.
If you don’t have an address yet, you use the development site finder. Tell it a suburb and a product type — greenfield subdivision, townhouses, apartments, mixed-use, retail or bulky-goods, billboards, or energy and data-centre land — and it surfaces candidate sites. An area scan sweeps a whole suburb at once and hands back a ranked shortlist instead of one parcel. From there you can watch development applications lodged near an address, so you see what the neighbours are getting approved before you commit. Two quick tools sharpen the yield question: the how-many-townhouses-fit checker and the subdivision checker.
Feasibility software is only as useful as the map between what you give it and what it hands back. Here is that map for GoSiteHunt.
| You provide | GoSiteHunt returns | What you do with it |
|---|---|---|
| An address, or a suburb + product type | Zoning + what you can build | Confirm the site can legally hold your intended product |
| Site type (subdivision, townhouses, apartments, mixed-use, retail, billboard, energy/data-centre land) | Indicative dwelling or lot yield | Size the project and the revenue |
| — | Development feasibility summary | See end value against costs and margin at a glance |
| — | Residual land value (max land price) | Set your ceiling offer — never overpay for the dirt |
| — | GO / NO-GO screen | Keep it on the shortlist or kill it in seconds |
| An area to sweep | Ranked candidate sites + nearby DA activity | Build a pipeline instead of chasing one block |
A single-address site report costs 1 credit; a whole-area scan costs 5. New accounts start with 50 free trial credits, which covers a genuine shortlist before you spend anything.
Residual land value (RLV) is the single number that stops developers overpaying, and it is the heart of any feasibility model. The logic runs backwards from the finished project. You start with what the completed dwellings or lots will sell for, strip out every cost of getting there, subtract the profit you demand for the risk, and whatever is left is the most you can rationally pay for the land.
The worked example below uses illustrative placeholder numbers for a small townhouse project. They are not a quote, a valuation or a market forecast — they exist only to show the shape of the calculation.
| Line (illustrative only) | Amount |
|---|---|
| Gross realisation — 4 townhouses × $650,000 | $2,600,000 |
| less Selling & marketing (approx. 4%) | −$104,000 |
| less Construction (4 × $360,000) | −$1,440,000 |
| less Professional fees, contingency, council contributions (approx. 12% of build) | −$172,800 |
| less Holding & finance costs | −$150,000 |
| less Required developer profit (approx. 20% of realisation) | −$520,000 |
| = Residual land value (max land price) | $213,200 |
The lesson matters more than the figures. If that site is on the market at $300,000, the deal is dead at your required margin — either the price has to come down, the yield has to go up, or you walk. If it is listed at $180,000, you have room. The GO/NO-GO screen is really just this comparison, run automatically: residual land value against asking price, with a margin buffer. You can run your own numbers in the residual land value calculator, and the RLV guide walks through each line in plain English.
Most feasibility tools do one thing. Some are single-country zoning lookups. Some are enterprise cash-flow models priced for large firms. Very few take you from a blank map to a ceiling offer. GoSiteHunt is built to be global, end-to-end, instant and affordable — the full chain from find to GO/NO-GO in one place.
Search by suburb and product type, or sweep a whole area, to surface candidate development sites and rank them. Site finder →
Zoning, yield and a feasibility summary from the address alone, so you know within seconds whether the envelope and the numbers can work. Zoning lookup →
Residual land value hands you the maximum you can pay and still make margin, so you negotiate from evidence, not hope. RLV calculator →
A single screen tells you to chase it or drop it, and DA watching near the address keeps the picture current. How it works →
There is an owner side too. If you hold land, GoSiteHunt can tell you what your site is worth to a developer, let you sell off-market direct to developers with no agent and no commission, and even coordinate sell-together amalgamation where neighbouring owners assemble a larger, more valuable parcel. It is the same feasibility engine, pointed at the seller instead of the buyer.
Because the engine is global, the same workflow that screens a block in Adelaide screens one across dozens of other markets. If you want to see how GoSiteHunt lines up against the alternatives, the feasibility software comparison lays it out. New to site sourcing? Start with the guide on how to find development sites.
Small and mid-size developers who need a fast, evidence-led first pass before commissioning consultants. Buyer and acquisition managers building a pipeline across suburbs. Buyer’s agents screening client briefs. Planners and architects testing yield early. And landowners who want to know what their site is really worth to a developer — and reach one directly. If your job involves deciding whether a piece of dirt is worth a real offer, this is the tool that makes that call in seconds instead of days.
Start with 50 free credits and screen a real address end to end — zoning, yield, residual land value and a GO/NO-GO call — before you spend a cent or commission a consultant.
A development tool is only valuable if it helps decide what to do next. GoSiteHunt is built around the early acquisition moment: an address, a listing or a suburb looks interesting, but the buyer does not yet know whether the planning, site capacity and numbers justify professional due diligence.
Weak sites should fail early because of zoning, overlays, parcel size, slope, lack of precedent, poor end values or a residual land value below the asking price.
Promising sites need a repeatable evidence trail: what can be built, what it may sell for, what it may cost, and what land price still leaves margin.
If the first-pass read survives, the next step is survey, planning advice, concept design, QS costing and formal financial modelling — not a blind offer.
Use this page as the top of the workflow, then run exact candidate addresses through the app. The output is not a valuation; it is a faster way to know which opportunities deserve the next dollar of diligence. The strongest acquisition teams use this kind of tool as a filter, not as a replacement for professional advice: many sites are rejected quickly, a smaller set gets deeper modelling, and only the cleanest opportunities move to formal due diligence.
Run an address through GoSiteHunt or start with the residual land value calculator before you commit due diligence spend.
Before relying on any first-pass development signal, confirm the address against the live planning source, the title and easements, survey dimensions, tree and heritage controls, infrastructure capacity, stormwater, access geometry, parking, open-space requirements and any recent or pending planning amendments. Then test the commercial side: realistic end values, selling time, construction rate, demolition, services, consultant fees, authority contributions, contingency, finance, tax treatment, delivery timeframe, holding costs and the margin required for the risk. The value of GoSiteHunt is that it keeps these checks connected. A page may help a site get onto the shortlist, but the address-level report and a professional review decide whether it deserves an offer.
For search users, this extra context matters because development feasibility is never a single-keyword answer. A useful page should explain the decision path, the assumptions and the next action, not just repeat a suburb, zone or tool name. That is why each GoSiteHunt discovery page links the topic back to a practical screening workflow. The goal is not to pad copy; it is to make the page useful enough that a buyer understands what evidence is missing, what a consultant would still need to confirm, and which next action moves the opportunity closer to or further from a genuine offer. Every page should answer a practical buyer question and point to a measurable address-level check.