Zoning fit
Scores each area against your target — greenfield subdivision, townhouses, apartments, mixed-use, retail or bulky-goods, billboards, or energy and data-centre land — so you only look where the controls allow what you want to build.
Stop scrolling listings hoping a block "might work". Scan a whole suburb for parcels that fit your development type, then open the winners in a full feasibility and residual land value screen — in seconds, in 35+ countries.
Run a free site checkCalculate max land priceFinding a development site is where most projects quietly go wrong. Acquisition teams burn weeks trawling portals and paying for one-off due diligence on blocks that were never going to stack up. The parcel looked big enough, the street felt right — and then the zoning, an overlay, an awkward frontage or the price killed it after the reports were already ordered. A development site finder flips that order: it screens an entire area first, filters on the constraints that decide whether a site can be developed, and hands you a ranked shortlist. You spend your due-diligence budget only on parcels that already passed a first test.
This page explains what a development site finder does, how a developer uses one in practice, the logic behind a worked residual-land-value screen, and how GoSiteHunt turns a suburb name plus a development type into candidate parcels you can act on.
At its core, a site finder answers one question at area scale: which parcels here could support the thing I want to build? That means combining planning data with parcel geometry and risk signals, then scoring each block against a target development type. The difference between a good finder and a spreadsheet is that the finder does this across hundreds of parcels at once and ranks them, so you are not the one manually opening each title.
Scores each area against your target — greenfield subdivision, townhouses, apartments, mixed-use, retail or bulky-goods, billboards, or energy and data-centre land — so you only look where the controls allow what you want to build.
Filters for lot size and shape that can physically support the development type. A 300 m² block will never be an apartment site; a battle-axe with a 3 m handle changes everything about yield.
Flags heritage, slope, overlays and weak local precedent early — the expensive surprises that usually surface only after you have paid for reports.
The workflow is deliberately linear, because that is how disciplined acquisition works: cast wide, filter hard, then spend money only on survivors.
The payoff is speed with discipline. Instead of a "maybe" folder of forty addresses, you get a short list of parcels that have each cleared a planning, geometry and economics test — and a documented reason for every one you dropped.
A finder is only as useful as what it returns. The table below maps what you give a scan against what GoSiteHunt gives back for each candidate parcel.
| You provide | The scan returns per parcel | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Suburb or area | Candidate parcels within the area, ranked | Turns a whole neighbourhood into a shortlist, not a scroll |
| Development type | Zoning fit and what you can build | Confirms the controls permit your product before you invest time |
| (automatic) | Dwelling or lot yield estimate | Tells you the scale of the opportunity, not just that it exists |
| (automatic) | Feasibility and residual land value | The most you should pay so the deal still works |
| (automatic) | GO / NO-GO screen | A fast verdict to keep or cut, with the reason attached |
| (automatic) | Risk flags: heritage, slope, overlays, precedent | Surfaces deal-killers before due-diligence spend |
Zoning tells you a site is possible. Residual land value (RLV) tells you whether it is worth it — the maximum you can pay for the land so that, after build cost, fees, finance and your required profit, the numbers still hold. This is the number that separates a real site from an expensive lesson, and it is why a finder that stops at zoning has done only half the job.
The logic is simple: take what the finished project sells for, subtract everything it costs to build and deliver, subtract the profit you require to take the risk — and whatever is left is the most you can rationally pay for the dirt. The figures below are illustrative placeholders to show the mechanics, not a market appraisal of any real site.
| Line item (illustrative only) | Amount |
|---|---|
| Gross realisation — 4 townhouses at ~$720,000 each | $2,880,000 |
| Less selling and marketing (~4%) | −$115,000 |
| Net realisation | $2,765,000 |
| Less construction (4 × ~$430,000) | −$1,720,000 |
| Less professional fees, contributions, contingency (~12% of build) | −$206,000 |
| Less finance and holding costs | −$140,000 |
| Less required developer profit (~18% on cost) | −$374,000 |
| Residual land value — the most to pay for the land | ≈ $325,000 |
Read the punchline, not the precision. If the owner wants $500,000 for a block whose residual value is around $325,000, the site is a NO-GO at that price no matter how attractive the zoning looks — unless you can lift end values, cut cost, or add yield. Move any of the levers — an extra dwelling, a keener build rate, a stronger sales result — and the residual moves with it. That is exactly the sensitivity a screening engine is built to run, so you argue over the right price instead of discovering it after settlement.
GoSiteHunt (built by Madison Jade Pty Ltd) is instant property-development feasibility and site-finding software. For any address across 35+ countries it returns, in seconds: zoning and what you can build, dwelling and lot yield, a full feasibility, a residual land value, and a GO / NO-GO screen. The site finder extends that same engine from a single address to a whole area — you scan a suburb by development type and open any candidate straight into the full report.
What makes it different is that it is global, end-to-end, instant and affordable. Most rivals are single-country, single-function, or enterprise-priced. GoSiteHunt runs the whole chain — find the parcel, feasibility, the maximum land price, then the GO / NO-GO — for developers, investors and acquisition managers who need answers today, not after a consultant's turnaround.
It scans for a full spread of development types: greenfield subdivision, townhouses, apartments, mixed-use, retail and bulky-goods, billboards, and energy or data-centre land. It also checks subdivision potential, watches development applications near an address so you can read local precedent, and includes an owner side — what your site is worth, selling off-market direct to developers with no agent and no commission, and sell-together amalgamation for adjoining owners.
Scan a suburb by type, then open candidates into a full feasibility and residual land value report. Start with the development site finder and the zoning lookup.
Pin the maximum land price with the residual land value calculator, or model the whole deal in the feasibility software.
Check what a block can carry with the subdivision potential checker and how many townhouses fit.
See the full workflow in how it works, or read how to find development sites and how to calculate residual land value. Comparing tools? See the software comparison.
The fastest way to understand a site finder is to point it at ground you know. GoSiteHunt is free to start with 50 trial credits — a single-address site report costs 1 credit and a whole-area scan costs 5, so the free tier covers several area scans plus a batch of individual reports before you pay anything. Run a scan on your target market, open the two or three parcels that rank highest, and read their residual land value and GO / NO-GO screens. If you want to see it running on a specific market first, browse a live area such as Adelaide.
Paid products layer on top only when you need them: a $49 vendor's report, Deal Flow alerts from $49/mo, a DocFlow planning report at $249 instant or $990 planner-reviewed, white-label at $99/mo, Assembly Pro at $299/mo, and Billboard or Energy Operator at $499/mo each. None of that is needed to run your first scans.
Run a free site checkSee the feasibility software
Screening outputs are indicative only and are not valuation, planning, financial or legal advice. Confirm planning controls, market evidence, costs and title before committing to a site.
A development tool is only valuable if it helps decide what to do next. GoSiteHunt is built around the early acquisition moment: an address, a listing or a suburb looks interesting, but the buyer does not yet know whether the planning, site capacity and numbers justify professional due diligence.
Weak sites should fail early because of zoning, overlays, parcel size, slope, lack of precedent, poor end values or a residual land value below the asking price.
Promising sites need a repeatable evidence trail: what can be built, what it may sell for, what it may cost, and what land price still leaves margin.
If the first-pass read survives, the next step is survey, planning advice, concept design, QS costing and formal financial modelling — not a blind offer.
Use this page as the top of the workflow, then run exact candidate addresses through the app. The output is not a valuation; it is a faster way to know which opportunities deserve the next dollar of diligence. The strongest acquisition teams use this kind of tool as a filter, not as a replacement for professional advice: many sites are rejected quickly, a smaller set gets deeper modelling, and only the cleanest opportunities move to formal due diligence.
Run an address through GoSiteHunt or start with the residual land value calculator before you commit due diligence spend.
Before relying on any first-pass development signal, confirm the address against the live planning source, the title and easements, survey dimensions, tree and heritage controls, infrastructure capacity, stormwater, access geometry, parking, open-space requirements and any recent or pending planning amendments. Then test the commercial side: realistic end values, selling time, construction rate, demolition, services, consultant fees, authority contributions, contingency, finance, tax treatment, delivery timeframe, holding costs and the margin required for the risk. The value of GoSiteHunt is that it keeps these checks connected. A page may help a site get onto the shortlist, but the address-level report and a professional review decide whether it deserves an offer.
For search users, this extra context matters because development feasibility is never a single-keyword answer. A useful page should explain the decision path, the assumptions and the next action, not just repeat a suburb, zone or tool name. That is why each GoSiteHunt discovery page links the topic back to a practical screening workflow. The goal is not to pad copy; it is to make the page useful enough that a buyer understands what evidence is missing, what a consultant would still need to confirm, and which next action moves the opportunity closer to or further from a genuine offer. Every page should answer a practical buyer question and point to a measurable address-level check.