Feasibility software
The full instant feasibility engine behind every screen.
Before you tie up capital chasing a block, know two things: how many townhouses it can hold, and the most you can pay for the land and still make your margin. GoSiteHunt screens both from any address, then hands you a GO or NO-GO signal.
Run a free site checkCalculate max land priceMost townhouse deals are won or lost before a single line is drawn. The developers who compound wealth are not the ones with the fanciest renders, they are the ones who kill weak sites fast and pay the right price for the good ones. The problem is that the analysis needed to do that, planning controls, dwelling yield, build cost, end value and residual land value, has traditionally lived in a slow, manual spreadsheet you only build once you are already invested in a block. By then the anchoring has done its damage.
Townhouse feasibility is the discipline of answering two questions before that anchoring sets in. First, the planning question: does the zone, site area and shape support the number of dwellings your numbers assume? Second, the money question: once you subtract every cost and your required profit from the finished value, how much is left for the dirt? That leftover is the residual land value, the single most important number in the deal, because it is the ceiling on what you should ever offer. GoSiteHunt produces both answers instantly, for any address, so you screen with numbers instead of hope.
Townhouses sit in an awkward middle. They are denser than a single dwelling, so the planning rules bite harder, minimum site areas, frontage, private open space, setbacks and parking all compress your yield. But they are simpler than an apartment building, so the margin is thinner and less forgiving. A single extra dwelling can swing a marginal site into profit; a single missed overlay can wipe the margin out. That sensitivity is why screening speed matters. If it takes a day to model each block, you only ever model the blocks you already like, which is a recipe for buying the wrong one at the wrong price.
The other trap is working forwards instead of backwards. Plenty of developers start from the asking price, add their costs, and hope the end value covers it. Feasibility done properly runs the other way. You fix the finished value the market will pay, subtract what it costs to build and sell, subtract the profit you refuse to work without, and only then arrive at the land price. Do it in that order and the land price becomes an output you can walk away from, not an input you rationalise around.
Residual land value (RLV) is deliberately backwards. You start at the end of the project and peel costs away until only the land is left. The logic runs like this:
If the asking price sits below the residual, the deal has headroom. If it sits above, you either negotiate, find more yield, or walk. GoSiteHunt runs this calculation for you off the yield each site supports, so instead of building a spreadsheet to discover the ceiling, you see it immediately and spend your energy deciding whether to act.
The table below walks a simplified four-townhouse site through the residual logic. Every figure is an illustrative placeholder chosen to show the method, not a market quote for any real block or region. Your own costs, values and margin will differ, and that is exactly the point, the framework stays constant while the inputs change with the address.
| Line item | Basis (illustrative) | Amount (illustrative) |
|---|---|---|
| Gross realisation | 4 townhouses × $620,000 | $2,480,000 |
| Less construction cost | 4 × $320,000 build | −$1,280,000 |
| Less professional & council fees | ~8% of build | −$102,000 |
| Less selling & marketing | ~3% of realisation | −$74,000 |
| Less finance & holding | Interest over program | −$96,000 |
| Less developer profit | 20% margin on cost/realisation | −$378,000 |
| Residual land value | The most to pay for the block | ≈$550,000 |
Illustrative only. These placeholder numbers demonstrate the residual method and are not a valuation, cost estimate or forecast for any specific site.
Read the bottom line as a decision rule. In this illustration, roughly $550,000 is the ceiling. A block listed at $500,000 leaves margin to absorb surprises; one at $650,000 needs a fifth dwelling, cheaper construction or a stronger end value before it works, and if none of those are real, the answer is no. That is the GO or NO-GO discipline in one number, and it is the number GoSiteHunt puts in front of you first.
Enter any address and GoSiteHunt returns an instant development screen. The inputs it reads and the outputs it produces map directly onto the feasibility questions above.
| What it reads | What it returns | Why it matters for townhouses |
|---|---|---|
| Address & parcel | Zoning and what you can build | Confirms townhouses are a permitted or likely use |
| Site area & shape | Estimated dwelling and lot yield | Sets how many units the block can hold |
| Local values & costs | Development feasibility | Tests whether the yield actually pays |
| Feasibility inputs | Residual land value | The most you should pay for the land |
| All of the above | GO / NO-GO screen | A fast triage verdict before deep work |
Because a single site report costs one credit and the workflow takes seconds, you can screen a whole shortlist in an afternoon rather than a fortnight. GoSiteHunt also finds candidate townhouse sites by suburb and type, scans whole areas at five credits a scan, checks subdivision potential, and watches development applications near an address so you see what neighbours are lodging. There is an owner side too: if you hold land, it can tell you what your site is worth and let you sell off-market direct to developers, including sell-together amalgamation with adjoining owners.
The fastest way to understand the tool is to use it on a real address, but here is where each piece fits into a townhouse workflow:
The full instant feasibility engine behind every screen.
Model the maximum land price for two, three or four dwellings.
Confirm the zone and what it allows before ordering a report.
Get a quick indicative dwelling count for a block.
See whether a site can be split before you dig deeper.
Find townhouse-ready blocks by suburb and type.
Prefer to go deeper first? The guide to calculating residual land value walks through the method line by line, the guide to finding development sites covers sourcing, and the how it works page shows the end-to-end flow from search to verdict. If you want to see how GoSiteHunt stacks up against other tools, the feasibility software comparison lays out where it fits, and if you develop in South Australia, the Adelaide page is a good local starting point.
Most feasibility tools are single-country, single-function, or priced for enterprise teams. GoSiteHunt is the opposite on all three counts. It is global, working across 70-plus countries with the same address-in, verdict-out flow. It is end-to-end, taking you from finding a site, to feasibility, to the maximum land price, to a GO or NO-GO call, rather than solving one slice. And it is instant and affordable, with a free start of 50 trial credits so you can screen properly before spending a cent. That combination lets a solo developer or a lean acquisitions desk run the screening volume that used to need a team and a stack of spreadsheets.
Stop modelling blocks you already like and start pricing them. Run an address, read the yield, read the residual, and get a straight GO or NO-GO before you make an offer.
Run a free site check Calculate max land priceA development tool is only valuable if it helps decide what to do next. GoSiteHunt is built around the early acquisition moment: an address, a listing or a suburb looks interesting, but the buyer does not yet know whether the planning, site capacity and numbers justify professional due diligence.
Weak sites should fail early because of zoning, overlays, parcel size, slope, lack of precedent, poor end values or a residual land value below the asking price.
Promising sites need a repeatable evidence trail: what can be built, what it may sell for, what it may cost, and what land price still leaves margin.
If the first-pass read survives, the next step is survey, planning advice, concept design, QS costing and formal financial modelling — not a blind offer.
Use this page as the top of the workflow, then run exact candidate addresses through the app. The output is not a valuation; it is a faster way to know which opportunities deserve the next dollar of diligence. The strongest acquisition teams use this kind of tool as a filter, not as a replacement for professional advice: many sites are rejected quickly, a smaller set gets deeper modelling, and only the cleanest opportunities move to formal due diligence.
Run an address through GoSiteHunt or start with the residual land value calculator before you commit due diligence spend.
Before relying on any first-pass development signal, confirm the address against the live planning source, the title and easements, survey dimensions, tree and heritage controls, infrastructure capacity, stormwater, access geometry, parking, open-space requirements and any recent or pending planning amendments. Then test the commercial side: realistic end values, selling time, construction rate, demolition, services, consultant fees, authority contributions, contingency, finance, tax treatment, delivery timeframe, holding costs and the margin required for the risk. The value of GoSiteHunt is that it keeps these checks connected. A page may help a site get onto the shortlist, but the address-level report and a professional review decide whether it deserves an offer.
For search users, this extra context matters because development feasibility is never a single-keyword answer. A useful page should explain the decision path, the assumptions and the next action, not just repeat a suburb, zone or tool name. That is why each GoSiteHunt discovery page links the topic back to a practical screening workflow. The goal is not to pad copy; it is to make the page useful enough that a buyer understands what evidence is missing, what a consultant would still need to confirm, and which next action moves the opportunity closer to or further from a genuine offer. Every page should answer a practical buyer question and point to a measurable address-level check.