Gross realisation
Achievable end value per dwelling, or rate per square metre × net sellable area, grounded in the yield the site actually supports.
Most sites die on price, not on planning. Screen any address in seconds — gross realisation, build cost, finance, developer margin and the most you should ever pay for the land — before you waste a week and a deposit on a deal that never stacked up.
Run a free site checkCalculate max land priceEvery development deal is one equation with one honest answer. Add up what the finished scheme sells for. Take away everything it costs to build, fund, sell and get approved. Take away the profit you need to justify the risk. Whatever is left is the most you can pay for the land — and if that number sits below the asking price, the deal does not work, no matter how much you like the street. A development feasibility calculator exists to surface that answer in minutes instead of at settlement, so you spend your time on sites that can actually pay you.
The pain is familiar to anyone in acquisition. You find a block that looks perfect, build a spreadsheet, chase agents for comparables, guess at build rates, and three days later discover the numbers were never there. Do that across thirty addresses and you have burned a month on deals a two-minute screen would have killed on the first pass. The payoff is a fast, repeatable GO/NO-GO filter that rejects the dross early and reserves real effort for the sites worth it.
A feasibility calculation is a chain, and each link depends on the one before it. It starts with gross realisation — the total value of everything you sell when the project completes. For a townhouse project that is the achievable end value per dwelling multiplied by the number of dwellings. For an apartment or commercial scheme it is net sellable (or lettable) area multiplied by an achievable rate per square metre. Get this wrong and everything downstream is fiction, which is why grounding it in real sold evidence matters more than any other single input.
From gross realisation you subtract total development cost: construction and civil works, professional fees (design, planning, engineering, survey), authority and contribution charges, a contingency for the things that always go wrong, marketing and selling costs, and finance. Then you subtract your target developer margin — the profit you require, usually expressed as a percentage of cost or of realisation. What remains after profit and every cost is the residual land value: the ceiling on what you can pay for the dirt and still earn your margin.
The table below sets out the core inputs a feasibility screen consumes and the outputs it returns. GoSiteHunt pre-fills the planning and yield inputs directly from the address so you are refining assumptions, not building a model from scratch.
| Stage | What goes in | What comes out |
|---|---|---|
| Planning | Address, zoning, what you can build | Permitted use, height and yield constraints |
| Yield | Site area, zone rules, product type | Dwelling or lot count the site supports |
| Revenue | End value per dwelling or rate per m² × yield | Gross realisation |
| Cost | Build, civils, fees, contributions, contingency | Total development cost before land |
| Selling & finance | Marketing, agent fees, funding cost | Fully loaded project cost |
| Profit | Target margin on cost or realisation | Required developer profit |
| Residual | Realisation − cost − profit | Residual land value (max land price) |
| Decision | Residual vs asking price | GO / NO-GO screen |
Numbers below are illustrative placeholders to show the mechanics, not a live valuation of any real site. Assume a small infill parcel that supports six townhouses.
| Line | Assumption | Amount (illustrative) |
|---|---|---|
| Gross realisation | 6 dwellings × $650,000 achievable end value | $3,900,000 |
| Construction & civils | 6 × $340,000 build | −$2,040,000 |
| Professional & authority fees | ~7% of build | −$143,000 |
| Contingency | ~5% of build | −$102,000 |
| Marketing & selling | ~3% of realisation | −$117,000 |
| Finance | Indicative funding cost | −$180,000 |
| Target developer profit | 20% margin on cost | −$514,000 |
| Residual land value | The most you should pay for the land | ≈ $704,000 |
The logic reads straight down the column: realisation of $3.9m, roughly $2.58m of hard and soft costs, then about $514k of required profit, leaves a residual near $704,000. If the land is on the market at $850,000, the deal is a NO-GO at a 20% margin — you would either need cheaper land, a higher achievable end value, more yield, or a thinner margin than the risk deserves. That single comparison, residual versus asking price, is the heart of every acquisition decision, and it is exactly what a feasibility screen automates.
The workflow is the same whether you are an independent developer, an investor testing a hold-versus-develop play, or an acquisition manager clearing a pipeline. You paste an address. The tool returns zoning and what you can build, the dwelling or lot yield the site supports, a first-pass feasibility, and the residual land value. You compare that residual to the price the land is being offered at. If it clears with room to spare, the site earns a place on your shortlist and a deeper model. If it does not, you move on in seconds and keep your energy for deals that can pay.
Run at scale, this changes how a team operates. Instead of hand-modelling every lead, you screen dozens of addresses, keep the handful that clear the margin test, and only then invest in comparable-sales research, cost quotes and planning conversations. The calculator does not replace judgement — it decides where your judgement is worth spending.
Achievable end value per dwelling, or rate per square metre × net sellable area, grounded in the yield the site actually supports.
Build, civils, professional and authority fees, contingency, marketing, selling and finance — the true cost before land.
What is left for the land after target profit and every cost. The ceiling on what you can pay. Open the RLV tool →
GoSiteHunt is instant property-development feasibility and site-finding software. For any address across 35+ countries it returns, in seconds: the zoning and what you can build, the dwelling and lot yield, a development feasibility, the residual land value — the most you should pay for the land — and a GO/NO-GO screen. You are not maintaining a fragile spreadsheet or reconciling five browser tabs; the planning and yield inputs are populated from the address, and you refine the revenue and cost assumptions that matter for your product and market.
It is also end-to-end. Beyond scoring an address you already have, GoSiteHunt finds candidate development sites by suburb and type — subdivision, townhouses, apartments, mixed-use, retail, billboards and energy or data-centre land — scans whole areas, checks subdivision potential and watches development applications nearby. That is the differentiator: most rivals are single-country, single-function or enterprise-priced, whereas GoSiteHunt is global, end-to-end (find → feasibility → max land price → GO/NO-GO), instant and affordable. There is even an owner side — what is my site worth, and sell off-market direct to developers with no agent and no commission.
Explore the connected tools and guides:
Pricing is built for real screening. You start free with 50 trial credits — a site report is 1 credit and an area scan is 5 — so the free tier covers a genuine session. Optional paid products sit alongside: a $49 vendor's report, Deal Flow alerts from $49/mo, the DocFlow planning report at $249 instant or $990 planner-reviewed, White-label at $99/mo, Assembly Pro at $299/mo, and Billboard or Energy Operator at $499/mo each. See how it works for the full flow.
Stop hand-modelling deals that were never going to pay. Paste an address, get zoning, yield, feasibility, residual land value and a GO/NO-GO in seconds, and keep only the sites that clear your margin.
Run a free site check Calculate max land priceOutputs are indicative screening only and are not valuation, planning, financial or legal advice. Confirm planning controls, market evidence and costs before committing to a site.
A development tool is only valuable if it helps decide what to do next. GoSiteHunt is built around the early acquisition moment: an address, a listing or a suburb looks interesting, but the buyer does not yet know whether the planning, site capacity and numbers justify professional due diligence.
Weak sites should fail early because of zoning, overlays, parcel size, slope, lack of precedent, poor end values or a residual land value below the asking price.
Promising sites need a repeatable evidence trail: what can be built, what it may sell for, what it may cost, and what land price still leaves margin.
If the first-pass read survives, the next step is survey, planning advice, concept design, QS costing and formal financial modelling — not a blind offer.
Use this page as the top of the workflow, then run exact candidate addresses through the app. The output is not a valuation; it is a faster way to know which opportunities deserve the next dollar of diligence. The strongest acquisition teams use this kind of tool as a filter, not as a replacement for professional advice: many sites are rejected quickly, a smaller set gets deeper modelling, and only the cleanest opportunities move to formal due diligence.
Run an address through GoSiteHunt or start with the residual land value calculator before you commit due diligence spend.
Before relying on any first-pass development signal, confirm the address against the live planning source, the title and easements, survey dimensions, tree and heritage controls, infrastructure capacity, stormwater, access geometry, parking, open-space requirements and any recent or pending planning amendments. Then test the commercial side: realistic end values, selling time, construction rate, demolition, services, consultant fees, authority contributions, contingency, finance, tax treatment, delivery timeframe, holding costs and the margin required for the risk. The value of GoSiteHunt is that it keeps these checks connected. A page may help a site get onto the shortlist, but the address-level report and a professional review decide whether it deserves an offer.
For search users, this extra context matters because development feasibility is never a single-keyword answer. A useful page should explain the decision path, the assumptions and the next action, not just repeat a suburb, zone or tool name. That is why each GoSiteHunt discovery page links the topic back to a practical screening workflow. The goal is not to pad copy; it is to make the page useful enough that a buyer understands what evidence is missing, what a consultant would still need to confirm, and which next action moves the opportunity closer to or further from a genuine offer. Every page should answer a practical buyer question and point to a measurable address-level check.